Annual Prizes and Awards

BAP Psychopharmacology Awards

The BAP Psychopharmacology Awards are awarded annually to reward excellence in both clinical and non-clinical psychopharmacology. Nominations are reviewed by a panel of BAP Officers/Council Members, and the Awards (Certificate and £250) are awarded at the conference dinner at the annual Summer Meeting.

PRIZES FOR RESEARCH BY NON-CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGISTS
One award of £250 for the best nomination submitted no more than 6 years post-doc
One award of £250 for the best nomination submitted no more than 12 years post-doc

PRIZES FOR RESEARCH BY CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGISTS
One award of £250 for the best nomination submitted no more than 10 years after medical graduation
One award of £250 for the best nomination submitted no more than 20 years after medical graduation

Nominations, either from individuals or from members of the BAP wishing to nominate an individual should be submitted to the BAP Office, and must comprise the following:

1. A curriculum vitae

2. Three key published papers that have undergone peer review

3. A 250-word resumé of the nominee’s achievements to date and plans for the future

A condition of each Award is that the successful candidates will provide an abstract and make a short oral presentation at the Summer Meeting.

Notes:
1. Clinical pharmacologists are defined as those who hold a medical degree (e.g. MBChB), and non-clinical psychopharmacologists as those without a medical degree. The separation refers to the primary degree of the applicants and not to the nature of their research

2. The different time frame for the two categories of researchers has been adopted on the basis that most clinical psychopharmacologists will spend several years in clinical training after medical graduation before they are eligible to enter a research post whereas non-clinical psychopharmacologists can enter a research post immediately after receiving a doctorate. In addition most clinical psychopharmacologists work part-time in research and part-time in clinical practice whereas non-clinical psychopharmacologists are more likely to hold full time research posts.

3. BAP reserves the option of not awarding prizes should a sufficient standard not be met.

4. The prizes are only open to current Members of the BAP.

The Honorary General Secretary will consider likely conflicts of interest and then delegate to a number of BAP Council Members who will review nominations for the various awards. Where a BAP Council Member is requested to review a prize in which a conflict of interest arises for them (e.g. a former PhD student has been nominated) they will excuse themselves from the process and another Council Member will be asked to replace them.

Whilst Council members are not prohibited from applying for prizes, the Honorary General Secretary additionally seeks the endorsement of one of the Presidents (current, immediate past or elect), according to their expertise, and who does not have a direct conflict of interest, before any such prize is awarded to a Council Member.

Applications are now closed.

2016 winner(s)


2016 Winners: Michael Browning, Jane Pei-Chen Chang, Liz Tunbridge and Simon Trent
2016 Winners: Michael Browning, Jane Pei-Chen Chang, Liz Tunbridge and Simon Trent

Previous Winner(s)

2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010